Washington, DC, United States (AHN) – After two years of investigating, a U.S. Senate committee has charged that Goldman Sachs knew the mortgage-backed securities it was selling to investors would fail.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations looked at the behavior of Wall Street banks during the credit crisis and found Goldman Sachs knowingly misled investors.

In a report issued Wednesday, the committee said that Goldman failed to tell banks and other investors that four sets of complex mortgage securities were risky. Moreover, Goldman was betting the investment’s value would fall and did not mention to investors that it did not believe in backing the investments it was selling.

Goldman marketed billions of dollars worth of poor quality mortgage securities that were parceled out to bundles of securities called collateralized debt obligations.

But Goldman didn’t invest much in the collateralized securities. On the risk, or long side, Goldman only invested $6 million, and then Goldman secretly invested $2 billion in bets against the securities, which was the opposite or short position. Goldman did not tell investors about the bank’s bets against the securities it was selling them.

In addition, the committee found that Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein’s testimony to Congress in 2010 was misleading. It has asked the Justice Department to investigate Blankfein’s testimony.

However, Goldman Sachs has disputed the findings of the report. The bank also says all its executives gave truthful and accurate testimony to Congress in 2010.

Other banks were investigated along with Goldman.

The Senate committee made similar charges against Deutsche Bank and also found that Washington Mutual ignored warnings from its chief credit officer to knowingly underwrite poor quality mortgages.

View full post on All Stories

Ellie Mae jumped 12.8 percent to $6.77 on the day of its initial public offering. The company had priced its shares for the IPO at $6. That price, though, was down from Ellie’s prior proposal of an offering at $10.

View full post on Mortgage Stories

When you’re looking into Reverse Mortgage Requirements in Canada it can be confusing and strange and there are so many of them that it’s often hard to keep them straight and still be able to understand what it is that you need to bring with you to a lender’s office to be able to figure out whether or not you’ll actually qualify in the first place. It’s difficult enough trying to figure out what you need on a normal basis when it comes to getting paperwork together but it’s far harder when you are doing so to figure out whether or not you qualify for a reverse mortgage, much less whether or not you’ll be able to move onto the next step.

A Canadian reverse mortgage is designed so that you can use the portion of your home equity that is debt-free. This allows a home owner to get the money that they want without having to sell their home. However, not all lenders offer this type of mortgage and one of the Reverse Mortgage Requirements in Canada states that you need to be over 60 in order to even begin to qualify. If you happen to be married, this requirement applies to both members of the marriage so you both have to be over 60 in order to even get started.

While there are plenty of advantages to learning the Reverse Mortgage Requirements in Canada you also need to learn whether or not these Reverse Mortgage Requirements in Canada are going to be worth the hassle. While it is true that you can be loaned up to 40% of the total value of your house, the value of your house goes down over time due to the interest from the reverse mortgage. Additionally, when you reach death, the reverse mortgage has to be repaid in full over a set amount of time, which usually exceeds the amount of time that the lender has allowed. This can make it difficult on the loved ones that you leave behind. However, you don’t have to make any regular payments on the loan and the loan itself is tax free and does not effect any benefits you might be receiving from the country. Not to mention that you get to choose how you want to receive the loan and you don’t have to get to keep ownership of the house.

About Author
For more information about utilizing a reverse mortgage in Canada, see our site: Reverse Mortgages Canada

The volume of residential originations tumbled 29 percent between the fourth-quarter 2010 and the first three months of this year, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported. The overall poor performance was the result of a nearly one-half drop in correspondent originations. Chase said the channel funded just $14 billion, sinking from $26 billion in the final period of last year.

View full post on Mortgage Stories

Foreclosures, the latest

Here is another piece of advice to Washington state mortgage holders. This particular article involves foreclosures and the latest news.

Lately, very few things have been in the news more than the topic of home foreclosures. it is estimated there have been more than 4 million homes entering foreclosure over the past four years and roughly 300,000 are entering the first stage monthly.

Recently the attention has turned from the sheer volume of foreclosures to the procedural flaws in foreclosing that are threatening lenders’ rights to foreclose because legal “ownership” of the mortgage may not be readily determined or because paperwork related to foreclosing was improperly executed. The net result is that several major lenders have announced a moratorium on their foreclosure process to allow them time to review their documentation and to determine that they can legitimately move forward. This has interruped the normal flow of homes through the foreclosure process. Instead of having a predictable timeline, buyers must sit in limbo with respect to the actual availability of a particular home for purchase. Media focus on these issues has created attention and anxiety on a national scale, the real economic effect will likely be very localized and concentrated. You can forget homes going on the market in communities with lots of foreclosures where lenders own the mortgage and have halted the process, at least for a time. This could have the strange effect of boosting home prices in those areas since the foreclosure freeze is limited the availabe housing inventory. However as a national economic issue, the overall impact will probably not have a measureable or lasting effect on the housing market. That assumes, of course, that lenders move expeditiously to determine their ownership and identify steps necessary to deal with the process and documentation problem, like, resuming the foreclosure process or indentifying loan modifications and workouts. I will continue to monitor this situation very closely, and would encourage you to call or email me so we can discuss what this might mean to you.

#1#Sincerely,
Dexter Wellington

United States (ProPublica) – by Marian Wang

The Securities and Exchange Commission may soon file suit over a mortgage securities deal involving JPMorgan Chase and a hedge fund called Magnetar, Bloomberg reported. Two individuals have been notified of potential charges. They include a former executive at JPMorgan, the bank that created and marketed the security, and a former executive at GSC Capital, the firm that managed the selection of assets.

As we reported last fall, regulators have been investigating whether JPMorgan misled investors about the role that Magnetar, a hedge fund, played in selecting the assets that went into a $1.1 billion collateralized debt obligation created by the bank in 2007. The deal, known as “Squared,” was made up of slices of other CDOs backed by subprime mortgages. (See the prospectus for the deal.)

Squared was one of more than two dozen CDO deals that Magnetar did in the waning days of the housing boom, ultimately helping to create at least $40 billion of CDOs. (It was also one of several deals managed by GSC that also involved Magnetar.) As we detailed last year, Magnetar often pushed for riskier assets to be included in CDOs as part of a strategy to bet against the housing market. Magnetar has consistently denied that strategy and has told us that it would have made money regardless of the direction of the housing market.

Magnetar earned about $290 million off its bet on Squared. The firm does not appear to be a target of the SEC’s investigation and declined to comment to Bloomberg. It previously told us it “did not choose the assets in any CDO,” though emails recently published by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission suggest otherwise.

The former JPMorgan executive at the center of the investigation, Michael Llodra, was global head of the bank’s CDO business. Bloomberg reported that Llodra disclosed in his broker registration filings that he received a notice of potential legal action, or Wells notice, from the SEC in January. Llodra’s attorney, Sean Hecker, declined our request for comment.

JPMorgan earned about $20 million for creating the deal, we were told, but the bank ultimately lost about $880 million when the safest slices of the CDO—which the bank kept on its books—lost value. Investors in Squared also suffered significant losses.

The SEC also sent a Wells notice to Edward Steffelin, a former executive at GSC Group, the firm that helped manage the “Squared” deal. Steffelin also declined our request for comment. CDO managers, like GSC, are supposed to select assets for the CDO with the interests of investors in mind.

Spokesmen for JPMorgan, GSC Capital and the SEC declined to comment to Bloomberg.

– Provided by ProPublica.org

View full post on All Stories

The former chief executive officer of failed Taylor, Bean and Whitaker Mortgage Corp. faces up to five years in prison after pleading guilty in the massive fraud scheme. A New Jersey mortgage broker was sentenced to 30 months in prison for his role in a $25 million fraud scheme against PNC. The owner of Pacific Coast Mortgage was sentenced to 20 years behind bars.

View full post on Mortgage Stories

Financial Resources Mortgage Inc. acted as a hard-money lender, obtaining capital from individual investors who were solicited by “false, misleading and deceptive” direct mail marketing, according to a report from the State of New Hampshire. Also in on the scheme was CL and M Inc., which serviced the loans. The founders of both companies have been sentenced to prison.

View full post on Mortgage Stories

A lot of homeowners have done a thorough research about lenders prior to they predetermine a special one. They kept paying their home loan regularly and developed an excellent standing with their loan provider. Suddenly, one day they got a letter informing that their lender has been amalgamated, merged with one other, assigned their mortgage to a fresh company or is bankrupt.

This happens to a lot of people without regard to how they obtain their mortgage. When a small provincial lender go on writing mortgage business eternally, a sizeable countrywide lender may be amalgamated. Mortgages get tranferred everyday. Mortgage banks are amalgamated or merged or gone out of business. This is not something new. In fact several lenders underwrite home loans for the sole objective of trading them in the secondary mortgage market. The time applicants used to attain their home mortgages from a local lender and remain with it till the end has passed.

The fact remains that you would need to find out the best home mortgage rates when you are looking for a new mortgage or refinance without bothering too much about what could become of the lender. Once you attain a mortgage loan you keep paying it as expected till you are told otherwise even your bank is stressed or in the progress of closing down.

Your mortgage loan is an important asset to any lender and some other firm would purchase it eventually. The positive news is that nearly every time your loan rates, payments and other conditions are secured in your agreement. Just the address and the name of the firm could change. Regardless, you continue sending the payments as expected to the last known address and lender till you are requested differently. Do not make the wrong move of stopping your payments in at any rate. That will lead to troubles for you. In addition, pursuing to discovery a solid lender for as long as your home loan period may be a pointless effort since the recent developments in the business have proved it.

Lately the rates have been floating in the historic low levels. Then arrived the quantitative easing and that may have persuaded number of prospective mortgage loan applicants to be patient slightly longer for better rates. This week we have understood that if it is not a dangerous game to play at least psychologically testing one. The rates have been moving between the top and the bottom of the spread in one day. All of a sudden there is nobody coming up with a forecast as to where they will stabilize.

It is possible that the spread might be broken either way. Before long we may discover which direction it is going to go, but how many homeowners will be able to control their nerves and remain dedicated to awaiting for lower rates till they are influenced to refinance their home loans. Absolutely it is not difficult to understand their point. Such rates do not come round pretty often and if they could have them at a half a percent below, they would be economizing noticeable amount on interest throughout the term of their home mortgage.

Nevertheless, ignoring those low rates as the ratesmove up from here and never look back would be very disheartening. And it may result in real effect for a few homeowners. Perhaps you could set a time restrictions and for example if the rates would not decrease extra till the end of the year, you will secure before the year is over. It is a quite difficult judgement when to refinance just now when there are plenty arguments for even lower rates. There may be several other gunuine grounds as to why they would not drop any further as well. But it would be unpleasant to escalate the agitation of a few bothered souls to dig deeper at the moment. Let us just say that they are brave and end the discussion.